Skip to content

Conversation

@mahadzaryab1
Copy link
Collaborator

@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 commented Sep 1, 2024

Which problem is this PR solving?

Resolves #5912

Description of the changes

  • Removed the log dumps in the CI workflow files and replace them with log dumps in the script files

How was this change tested?

  • I ran the scripts locally and deliberately made them fail to ensure that the logs get printed. I also checked that the logs don't get printed when the scripts pass.

Checklist

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.82%. Comparing base (edc3152) to head (6cd6e20).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5915      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.81%   96.82%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         342      342              
  Lines       16525    16525              
==========================================
+ Hits        15998    16000       +2     
+ Misses        340      339       -1     
+ Partials      187      186       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
badger_v1 8.05% <ø> (ø)
badger_v2 1.82% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-3.x-v1 16.62% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-3.x-v2 1.75% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v1 16.62% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v2 1.75% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-6.x-v1 18.78% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-7.x-v1 18.85% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-8.x-v1 19.04% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-8.x-v2 1.81% <ø> (ø)
grpc_v1 9.49% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
grpc_v2 7.16% <ø> (ø)
kafka-v1 9.74% <ø> (ø)
kafka-v2 1.82% <ø> (ø)
memory_v2 1.81% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
opensearch-1.x-v1 18.89% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
opensearch-2.x-v1 18.89% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
opensearch-2.x-v2 1.81% <ø> (ø)
tailsampling-processor 0.46% <ø> (ø)
unittests 95.30% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 changed the title [WIP] Fix Integration Test Log Dumping For Storage Backends Fix Integration Test Log Dumping For Storage Backends Sep 1, 2024
@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 marked this pull request as ready for review September 1, 2024 01:49
@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 1, 2024 01:49
@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 requested a review from jkowall September 1, 2024 01:49
@dosubot dosubot bot added the area/storage label Sep 1, 2024
Copy link
Member

@yurishkuro yurishkuro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@yurishkuro yurishkuro added the changelog:ci Change related to continuous integration / testing label Sep 1, 2024
@yurishkuro yurishkuro merged commit 8879938 into jaegertracing:main Sep 1, 2024
@mahadzaryab1 mahadzaryab1 deleted the dump-logs branch September 1, 2024 02:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/storage changelog:ci Change related to continuous integration / testing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Reliably dump logs from integration tests

2 participants